Right
Paul that is the same arguement that you have said over and over and over again, but nontheless you still have fundamental issues that are wrong. THe UN can go into any nation as long as that nation gives consent . . . therefore the UN is not a police force of any kind, but yet it is an agent to rebuild nations. It rebuilds them by reducing poverty and aids and getting humanitiarian help to the citizens. Also it helps maitain stability in a region by employing troops for a short resolution to a problem. And lastly it through its body allows for the democratic process in a country to work, while at the same time introducing the nation into a world economy and not just that of US's allies.
And to Ben, you don't understand aspects of the UN to well either, when I am talking about Koffi as a person I am not talking about the UN because he has no more control over the UN than I do. The only difference is that who is and his posisition gives him respect from the securtiy council to advocate what goes on in the UN, therefore I am not saying that one man should rule over Iraq, as Koffi wouln't have any power in Iraq, and instead I am advising that an actual coalition (not Bush's three nations) rebuilds Iraq.
And to Ben, you don't understand aspects of the UN to well either, when I am talking about Koffi as a person I am not talking about the UN because he has no more control over the UN than I do. The only difference is that who is and his posisition gives him respect from the securtiy council to advocate what goes on in the UN, therefore I am not saying that one man should rule over Iraq, as Koffi wouln't have any power in Iraq, and instead I am advising that an actual coalition (not Bush's three nations) rebuilds Iraq.