Ben your arguement is completely unfounded. No where in my article did I say that the Iraqis should destroy their oil. All I was stating was that it seemed odd for Bush to make it so blatent that he didn't want the Iraqis to destroy their oil wells. And his own words made me feel as though he was more concerned about the oil then the people of Iraq themselves. You can not truly argue with this because it is a fact, this is how Bush's words made me feel. And you know what your last post was a mindless devotion to the government. You basically stated it is too late now to care about Iraq and to protest an unjust war against Iraq instead because "the cards are on the table" we must just sit idle and watch as Bush wages war. And lastly Ben I know your aren't stupid and I know that you aren't an idealist so all I want you to do is that maybe, just maybe America is the goodness fairy that you make it out to be, yes America does a lot of good in this world, but when it comes to installing regimes and hasn't been at its finest. You know this as well as I, so lets not try and pretend that everything will be good and happy after good old happy America liberates the sad people of Iraq and puts big smiles on every one's faces - Don't try and bull that shit on this website because you are better than that mindless dribble.
Even if we create electric cars, electric anything it still needs to be lubricated. LUBRICATION COMES FROM CRUDE OIL. Same place we get gasoline. As does jet, and rocket fuel. Without crude oil, no space exploration, no electric cars, no imported monkeys, no intercontinental travel. It is not as simple of a matter as the democrats want to make it. Oil is everything in the world today, EVERYTHING, but few would actually admit it.
Iraq has half the world?s oil and Sadam has a history of destroying oil fields. Without oil there would be mass starvation, and we would be thrown back to the Bronze Age. Think things out. Dumb Ass
What seems dumb to me, is that we're wasting money on oil, whereas we could focus more on more renewable sources. The money we're spending on OTHER COUNTRIES could be focused domestically on energy sources like solar and or wind energy. In fact, we could build a light rail system that would work instead of going to war. Maybe it's because I'm an isolationalist, but I think the money being wasted on this situation has some real purposes hear.
Fine Gross, encourage the Iraqis to destroy the fucking oil fields!! Do you give a damn about a post-war Iraq, or would you like the Iraqi people to continue to live in hoplessness and poverty? Now that the cards are on the table Gross, all we can do is pray. Hopefully the war will be quick and successful, with the minimum casualties on all sides. After the war, that oil is absolutely essential for making Iraq a democratic nation and rebuilding the countries economy. If you want another brutal dictator Gross, encouraging the Iraqis to destroy the oil fields is a great first step!
Mr. Hussein for every American that dies you will be held responsible,
for every Iraqi that dies you will be held responsible.
For every American city that is destroyed you will be held responsible,
for every Iraqi city that is destroyed you will be held responsbile.
For every slightest moment of discomfort an American feels you will be held responsible,
for every slightest moment of discomfort an Iraqi feels you will be held responsible.
For every human that has to fear the bombs of the United states or your own bombs, you will be held responsible. You have decided to not listen to the world's opinion and the opinions of the Security council. You have decided through your ruthlessness and your ignorance to continue to brutalize your citizens and defy the world. You have brought this war upon yourself by denying prospects of peace. You have had the choice to spare your country from suffering and misfortune , and instead welcomed war and committed genocide. You destablized this world, your country, and this country. You have killed far too many! You don't care about your countries citizens, so now it is time for them to finally be rid of you.
Sorry but that was a pretty decent ryhming pun. But I actually am writing about Sadamm because I can't spell his name - no actually I am writing because he scares the shit out of me because he is crazy. Sadamm has never refrained from using chemical weapons on his own people and has never been afraid to use force in the past. He did refrain from chemicals Kuwait, which does give me some hope, but not enough to be comfortable with him in such a tight position. He reminds me of a really physcotic, and angry squirrel that is in a few days will have his back against a wall with the only escape through America. Eventhough this analogy isn't totally true because Saddamm has such a vast underground tunneling system that he will be able to flee very quickly if needs be, but nonetheless the fact that a foriegn army will be taking over his nation, says to me that he might resort to some drastic plots. I would be very fearful if I were living in Israel right now as that is his closest target, but I am still very nervous about the US. An attack is expected on America, whether or not it will be foiled, and personally that makes me on the nervous side. I kind of feel as though I would be better off in a small nation that is surrounded by water that is neutral on almost every issue - Ah Ireland! I wish I lived in Ireland. It isn't that I am fearful of my life, but I am quite nervous of what Saddam (who is crazy) will release against America, Britian, and all the other nations that are supporting the forcible removal of Saddamm from their nations.
Mr. Bush for every American that dies you will be held responsible,
for every Iraqi that dies you will be held responsible.
For every American city that is destroyed you will be held responsible,
for every Iraqi city that is destroyed you will be held responsbile.
For every slightest moment of discomfort an American feels you will be held responsible,
for every slightest moment of discomfort an Iraqi feels you will be held responsible.
For every human that has to fear the bombs of the United states or the bombs of Saddam, you will be held responsible. You have decided to not listend the the world's opinion and the opinions of the Security council. You have decided through your ruthlessness and your ignorance to wage an unjust war. You have brought this war upon your own hands by denying prospects of peace. You have choice to not exhaust every option of peace, and instead declared war. You destablized this world and this country. You have killed far too many!
I find it really odd that almost of the nations in this world do not have a majority of their people supporting the war on Iraq. I have heard a few bigotted responses that say basically oh well the entire world is wrong and that America is the only nation in the world that can trully see the light. Or other responses that everyone is just not supporting war on Iraq because they hate America. What ever your opinion on the issue is it doesn't really matter because it doesn't change the fact that Bush has almost no support. His three major allies (only two that might contribute troops) are Spain and Britian. First off Britian's parliament doesn't support war and am not totally sure but I believe that because of how the government is structured Britian could not contribute troops. Then Spain's people are in a large majority opposed the war in Iraq, whether or not this is affecting the government, it should be a sign to Bush that people of the world do not want this war to take place. Then Israel will probably support this war and go invade Iraq. And on this issue I have a slightly differing stance . . . the Israelis should go and fuck up Saddam for the cruise missles that he lodged up Israel's ass in the Gulf War. Israel has a lot more stack and right in this war than I believe America does . . . (I hope the Jews get their sweet and deserved revenge on Saddam). The final response that I get when I ask people the question of why the other countries aren't supproting a war against Iraq, they say something to the extent that their leaders are incompotent. I am sorry but the leaders of the rest of the world are at the very least no more incompotent that President Bush and for the most part are more intelligent than Bush. In no way is America's government any more knowledgeable about worldy affairs than the rest of the world.
Last night during Bush's speech he began pleading with Iraqi troops (that he sympathizes with so much) asking them not to blow up their oil fields . . . Oh come on that had to seem a little unsettling to everyone that watched that speech no matter your opinions concerning Bush. The fact that he spent a good 20 seconds on the topic and about 1 minutes leading up to it in a 15 minute speech is pretty important. It is obvious to at least me that we might not only being going into Iraq to remove/disarm Saddamm, but could it be possilbe that America has some devious purposes?!?!? It couldn't be (sarcasm!). Actually the thing that really draws my attention to this statement is that I have heard it about 5 times in the last 3 weeks from Bush advisors who have been concerned with Iraq destroying their oil fields. And obviosly the oil fields could allow Iraqi economic recovery after the war, but most likely the oil will only benefit the richest people in Iraq who are subsequentally the "democraticatically elected" and "not tyranical" leaders that would take control over Iraq after Saddam is out of power, and I am sure that oil will just by chance end up helping out the Americans a whee bit too . . . Maybe!
I am getting really fucking sick of the fact that every God damn operation or bill or whatever the fuck it is is called some bull shit name like operation freedom, liberty shield, American acts. Opps I forgot America would never practice in any form of propoganda ever, so obviosly these names must be just name like this out of sheer coinincedence that all of the other names were taken! I believe that every time Bush names a policy something freedom or something to that extent, he is admitting the reluctance he has to that particular policy and is trying to make people not disagree with his policies and so on. And yes this is propoganda . . . it isn't obviosly as bad as some of the propoganda from Hitler, Stalin, Hussien, or many other Eastern nations, but it really is propoganda.
