PhonX's Posts

Jou I think you are quite right about the melee loving I ain't really for all those pulleys and levers and so on. You Franny o Jesse?

Very true some anti-black sentiment came from the war, but a large amount, i think not, unless your idea of large is actually very minute. Before they war there was plenty of anti-black sentiment except there wasn't a large of consentration of black people in the North. And also your point how no one on this site is anti-political parties is very incorrect, maybe because you are so pro-parties that you can't concieve the fact that some people aren't.

How dare you say that Brinkley is proof of your statement because as we all know his "factual book" left out and screwed up large amounts of very important information. And that isn't even debatable. Yes you are correct that the Confederacy's gov't modeled that of the Unions merely because the Confederacy didn't have enough time to create completely new goverment when they were worrying about the Union troops slaughtering the innocent farmers of the land and destroying their precious railroad. But Franson if you look at southern politics up to the Revolutionary War (i say revolution because this war was about revolting against a larger oppressor than England and it wasn't a civil war at all) the South always demonstrated a platform featuring a government that was less involved in the economy and general affairs of the country. And you point how the rich plantation owners ( a very small percent of the south) ran most of the country- um no really, I didn't know that people with money run a country? (sarcasm). And lastly as I started off saying Brinkley wasn't creditable well just to let you know just because it is on the internet doesn't mean it is factual to the least of the extent of the meaning of factual.

1) I am very glad that you are lazy because who isn't. 2) Oh yeah holding the union together was so very very important considering that the Confederacy was what America was all about. Small town farming and a small and barely exsisting government. I am sure you don't think this but to those people who are feebs and think that the Confederacy was more anti-black than the Union you are totally wrong because A) The Union had slaves in it and B) There was as much anti-black sentiment throughout the Union, and the trend of the North (Union) being just as much anti-black is that today in modern times the KKK is the largest in Wisconsin. So back to you Franson if Lincoln wouldn't have been so bent on retaining the Union, America wouldn't be as powerful today, which would eliminate the subsequent hatred from most of the other countries in the world. And with out the idealogy of America being so powerful than we wouldn't have such an expanism government. 3/5) I spoke incorrectly on the topic of Roosevelt and then your stance on parties. So to Recap...Manos, Hands of fate, no sorry that wasn't what I meant, but your article came completely off as though you had a stick of blind patriotism towards the republicans.

I don't have the time or the want to find you your links, but instead you can look them up yourself, you lazy lazy man. But what I don't understand is that when I have been ranting and raving for the last few weeks you said nothing. You passively sat and read and then as I presume agreed with my rants. Then I bring up the topic of you precious politcal party, in which your political opinion is merely shaped by that of the elites of your party, and you get very very angry and upset. So I am slightly laughing to myself thinking that your complete and absolute blind patriotism to your party has kept your from admitting to or at least acknowledging the hypcrocies that are omnipresent throughtout their entire platform. I am so critical of the Republicans because they have the possibility to having a great platform but yet the inequalties they portray leads me to stay indepedently conservative from all political parties as a whole. You can't sit there and say that republicans don't want the government to control moral issues because it is obvious that they do, they want the gov't to enforce their ideals and to suppress those who have different ones. What I find funny in you Franson as that in all regards I see you as a pretty liberal person. You support the Rosevelts and Lincoln, while you dislike Jackson. You would probably say that Regan was a great president just because the elites of your political party say so. All I want you to do is to take my article to heart, not for its lousy mechanics or its of base concepts, but because you should think with your own God damn brain and not the one that is prescribed to by your Republican officials. Think Man (Oh and yes you started a war of wits and I am way undermanned, so get ready for the bull shit cannons cause you are going down).

Well good I thought that maybe an article would get you lazy asses to write and it did, I am God fear me.

I have been looking over bill that Republicans have passed and I come to the conclusion to just fuck the Republicans, why? Because Republicans merely want the government to stay out of their economy, but on the other hand, they want the government to restrict anything than doesn't coincide with the WASP view point. YES I am a conservative, but not a fucking republican. I mean look at abortion for example, eventhough I am prolife yet I have completely different views than the moronic Republicans. Why do Republicans believe that prolife is a good thing, not because it will save the child's life, but no to punish the women for sleeping around. That is why they want abortion to be legal if there is rape involved, which to me it doesn't seem right to be able to kill a child because you were raped. Look at the Patriotism Act that was issued after 9/11, do they remind you of the Sedition Acts of John Adams because they sure as hell do to me. Over to the marijuana debate the Republicans constantly shout small government, let us run our own lives, yet they say this idea doesn't apply to marijuana because it is against our values. I truly do hate myself for claiming that I was a Republican earlier on these blogs, but I have seen the light and I am sickened with the Republicans. And lastly a little bit of clarificfication, throughout my rant I said Republicans well I am sure their are Republicans who don't have the same ideas as the one I laid out for you, I don't mean to make a blanket statement. But by referring to Republicans I am talking about the general attitude and ideals throught the party itself. So to conclude my last statement I think a good ol' Fuck The Republicans, will be very well in order indeed. (Oh and fuck spelling and commas as well).

Melee Loving
OR
Efficent German Sex
- WHAT IS YOUR CHOICE?

I saw numerous specials on TV about how great America was and so then they decided to include JFK into their mindless drone like ramblings. And I thought to myself "Self, that name, JFK, would never be important unless daddy Kennedy hadn't made fortunes on bootlegging during prohibition. Now not that I am much of a prohibitionist as I think it is a horrid oppressive and anti-Catholic law, but what is funny is that the Kennedys made their money and earned their fame through illegal activities. And is kind of humerous, at least to me, that good old King of Camelot became president through some illegal boose. Now to come to a point around this idea, most of the lefttus guerillas who are anti alcohol and think that minors shouldn't be drinking it are the same who believe Jack is one of our greatest presidents. So if alcohol made this man so great than why would you (leftus guerrilla) want me to not be drinking this shit?

When I read your article Juola I didn't pay much attention and I read it wrong, for what you said in your rebuke of my article mocking you made me think that I agreed with you. And I reread your article and it ended up that I agree with a large portion of your points. So I just want to say my mocking wasn't completely neccessary except I still don't like the channel shit as well as you quoting a two year older's book, but that has nothing to do with your philosopy. My apologies.