Haven't you seen the commercials? If subaru was really made in Japan, why is Paul Hogan (Crocodile Dundee) driving it? Why would it be called the "outback" instead of the "Mt. Fuji?" Come on Jesse! And even if it was made in Japan, Japanese have killed plenty of chinese in their day, so the ridiculous comparison stands. Booya!
Subaru is made in Japan, not australia, get your factes straight!
I was taking to Ben last night and I was bitching about Jerry Falwell so he made a comment something to the extent, damn falwell and damn Subaru WRXs. He obviosly said it sarcastically and mockingly to an extent, but nonetheless I was laughing hysterically because of it. So thus these post was written. Don't worry I am not comparing Hilter to the WRX we just needed to make fun of ourselves a whee bit!
During the course of human events, great evil arises. Such cases include the rise of Hitler's genocidal madness. A more contemporary example Jerry Falwell's hatred of gays, stating that all gays will go to hell and that God hates them. This brings us to the little thought of continent of evil, Australia. While settling the colony, the white settlers nearly eliminated an entire race of people known as the aborigines. With aboriginal blood, the settlers built up a prosperous colony, and started selling many products from it, namely Subaru cars!
The worst of these cars is the Subaru WRX, which has no practical usage whatsoever. Whoever drives it is driving over the corpses of dead aborigines, and showing off the wastefulness and genocidal nature of Western Civilization. Just as Hitler drove his Mercedes, so too do others drive their wasteful sports car. For shame. Evil is still all around us, even as you drive down 394.
Fine kick me off . . . no skin off my back. And jesse my articles did have a lot of facts in them yet . . . but I am sorry that my posts aren't written like Dr. Seuss boook.
Andrew, your last about eight articles you have written have been completely drawn out nonsensical bitching about things we cannot control. You your self are not too high and mighty to go the way of Magico. Work some sense into your rants. And try to be to the point; I don't enjoy reading your 4 page rants that could be summed up in 2 lines.
I would like to congratulate myself and being the first person to achieve the honor of writing 100 horridly confusing rants on the Atimes. I know what you are thinking that it must be hard to rant this hard for this long, but I tried my hardest and I managed to get here first. I know not only hold the honor of sexiest member of atimes, insulter of Franson, and according to Mr. Marrinson most liberal on the atimes, but now am the only and the first to get to 100 posts . . . boooya!
I was watching the O'Riely factor the other day and one of the guests said something to the extent that the liberals never praise the government for what they do well and they are always critizcizing it. And I took that to heart and the more I thought about it, the more I started agreeing with it. And then after I appreciated it for its valor I then thought to myself that that isn't such a bad thing. The federal government does not need people telling it "oh what a good job you did" and "way to go" no with the boundless potential that a our democratic system gives people should be always saying what it needs to do better. Just because the government improves on an issue we should not sit back and become passive, but instead we should appreciate the fact that that situation was resolved and start protesting and raising our voices about another issue that the government is doing wrong. And therefore there should never be a time in our history were people are saying that the government is doing a great job, but rather people should say the government has to do this and do that. It is our patriotic duty as democratic citizens to protest the government and to do it constantly!
Right Jesse, I forgot that you don't care about human beings and that you are totally fine with them be massacerd on the streets and then having the government saying that it never happend, so you would have no intention of at least trying to end some of the horrible breach of civil rights that is occuring in those nations . . .
As you said Jesse we are afraid of China and Russia, but moreover they are simiarly afraid of us. Russia doesn't even know where most of their nuclear missles, a great deal of them have been destroyed, and finally they don't have the means of launching a missle strike on America. China has nuclear capabilites, but I dont' know whether or not they have nuclear weapons, but that doesn't even matter they aren't going to nuke us for telling them that they have to stop oppressing their people. Reasonable men and women and especially the people that run nations do not want to nuke other nations especially America. If America is attacked we would not hessiate to strike back and every nation knows that, they aren't about to attack us any time soon.
But where you are wrong is that we can't do anything about it, there you are very wrong. There is a thing called "international trade" and America does a fair amount of it. We have lots of power to make nations suffer and to punish them for not agreeing with us. We have the power to stop trade with a nation and get all of our allies to stop trade with that nation. We could push for NATO countries to start boycotting those nations and we can get the UN to do the same. And Russia especially needs that help. Besides "starvation" as you put it we also have the thusly have the ability to turn the the international community against a certain nation. And once again Russia can't have that as they are trying to emerge from their former ideals and prosper in this new world. And China at the same time is trying to do that same thing and they as well can't afford to have the world turn against them, it would not be favorable.
It is possible to establish human rights in these nations because these nations need us and at least they are afraid of what can happen if they don't respect our power. We have this great power and if we don't use it we are once again guilty.
There is a reason we do not bug China or Russia. We the all-powerful united states are scared of them. Yes, I said it, scared. They both have nuclear arsenals large enough to destroy the entire world let alone our country, and they are both larger landmass then us. Would it even be remotely possible to overthrow either government? No, they are too wide spread. What you have to do is pay off authority figures so you can rot the inside and then kick down the outside. Russia, on the other hand is just far too large of a land mass. Remember how hard it is to find people in a small desert? Try the very large desert Siberia. People could hide there for years; even I would say centuries and we would never find them.
Simply put you do not mess with someone who could level you with a push of a button. Nuclear bombs are the great equalizer. You would not mess with even the smallest country if they had a nuclear arsenal.
Moreover, if not by violence then by what? Starvation? "If you don't be nice to your people we'll stop sending you the massive amounts of food we do!" We would be worse then them then.
Bringing Chinas and Russia's human rights up to code is not possible nor plausible at this time, so Andrew, shut up.
