To further clarify my beliefs, I believe that the absolutely ideal system would be where absolutely everyone in all the land had an equal opportunity to run for office. The lowliest bum on the street would have just as good a chance as the rich executive. However, I can never see that happening, as America is run by rich men and always has been. However, the next best thing I can see is eliminating people without an ounce of common sense and/or a brain between their ears (we're not talking really stringent standards of knowledge here... No more stringent than the current standards for being President). That's all.
I strongly disagree with you on your stance that only people of a certain intelligence can run for office. If it is decided for you who can and cannot run for office is that not evil? Is it just me or does that seem just the slightest bit fascist? I believe any American should have the right to run for president, for even though a person may have a lower IQ per se, he still may have more common sense than a person of higher IQ. This isn't to say this is always true though, take for instance Jimmy Carter, nice guy, potato farmer, but he had no common sense when it came to being president. He was the worst president in American history, we had I believe it was something like 400% inflation during his presidency(correct my figure if its wrong). We can't just go cutting off people options because their of lower intelligence or feebs, because that it self is unconstitutional and isn't right in any sense.
Which is what frightens me about the liberals trying to rewrite the Bill of Rights.
this is just a rant, as most of my things have been lately, but if they take our guns away what is there to keep the government in check?
Magico had his chance, i kicked him
By my call to change your writing style, I merely called for you to change your non-supported, meaningless style to one with more class and flair. Need I clarify any more?
Now then, on to the article I was meaning to write. The government, as it is now, has some very large problems with it now. It does too much meddling in people's private affairs (for example, the NSA (yes, I know you're reading this)). It restricts people too much in their pursuits of everyday life (through throngs of meaningless laws, which we all know exist). And above all, it steals our money (or at least will in a few short years)! But what needs to be done? Do a few minor changes need to be enacted, or does the entire Constitution require a new drafting? Talk of the Articles of Confederation in A.P. U.S. History got me thinking about this, and I believe that the government could be overhauled well by requiring that only people of obviously high intelligence could run for office (in more ways than just IQ, if that's what comes to mind). This way, feebs with money could not run rampantly powerful as we see is the case today. But now, to pass the ball: What do you all think about this important issue? Let's hear!
Die Biznitches Gunfire sound here
It happened to me again today. Those idiots in my gym class tweaked out on me, I wouldn't be surprised if the "specially abled" (thank you very much PC-thug A. Gross) girl was the smartest one in the whole class. I was playing well and though they were allowed to do it themselves I was one again forced out of the gray area. Even my own traitorous team turned on me. Two people especially chewwed my head off when a had had enough of their abuse and said no. What is it that the feminazis say no means no, right. They threatened my life, the nerve. I eventually moved to avoid a riot, and commented that I must Intimidate them. They had to hold one goth girl back. Where has justice gone in all rights I should have been able to Grossdance in any color area I wished. Who can I sui for this gross in justice, whatever I'll just bo it tommorrow.
To the Glorious Donat of Oz
Can't we all just get along
To Gross
I may have not made this clear I meant that the libs think that the 2nd ammendment is outof date and from a time in which they were needed to fend off wild beasts not that they actually were. As you and I know many things that the libs believe are wild fantasys unbased in any form of fact what so ever. Secondly when did I say I laughed at the "specially abled" person. I did not laugh that was more of a chuckle. And my verbosity offends your humble personage, I say perchance a real feeb were to be traumatized by my petty prose as to become morose than I shall say to them in a volumous cristaline oratory (in small words so they would understand), "I you got it flaunt it." And if my postings of the last day were in any way not in the spirit of the site I appologize to all of the readers, they were origionally intended for my website. I will let you know it's address when I feel like it.
To a certian wanna be literary editor.
You offend me sir, correct me I am wrong but would you prefer I write in a different style. How about Ghetto speak, hommie g face, me dogs been axing me ta... that enough of that. How about shakespearian, aNaRcHiSt times, time-honour'd friend, Hast thou, according to thy oath and band, Brought hither Chris Franson thy bold son, Here to make good the boisterous late appeal, Which then our leisure would not let us hear, Against the Duke of Magicoland. Beat that mister change writing styles, I like my writing style, change your perceptions to match my writings instead.
Magico, abuse your powers and they will go away, I created this page and I can kick you out of it
Well, this is pretty much a rant directed at an audience of Jeff, Jesse and I, but I'll try to make it as user-friendly as possible. In English class, all the books we've read have been terrible, but especially the "book" The House on Mango Street. This book was so utterly awful that I could barely put up with it. Reading it made me realize the positive sides of dying due to sudden and massive trauma to the face. But why? Why did we read this book? As I understand it, we were supposed to read it due to its "poetic" style. However, as far as I could tell, it was nothing more than poorly arranged phrases stacked into a page to create some semblance of weak imagery. But was there some deeper meaning to subjecting us to the torture of reading such a pretentious work? I'll leave that for Jeff to decide (thus, yes there was).
