Political Rants

I am going through a bit of a personal ordeal at the moment and may not write or work on the page for a bit

I insulted both of you two and yet you both fail to respond and try and discredit any of my logic or statements. So please, please respond to what I said then I can find the numerous logistical errors in your rebutts and then mock you some more, cause it is getting really old to say horrible crap and then go unchecked with out you trying to prove falisies. Respond quickly!!

I know that I have always felt good about myself for one good reason and that is that I am somewhat masculine. God gave me at least that one gift, but as I look back on life and reflect is being straight really a gift?

Everyone makes the assumption that effeminate men are nicer than masculine and typical men, so throughout my article I will as will make that assumption. What that assumption means though is that effeminate men are already better than mascline men in their emotional life and personal life. But the other part about effeminate men is they are now the ones who are working out and getting into shape at the fitness gyms. This means when walking down a street and you notice someone completely buff, you are going to think wow that guy is gay. This gives effeminate men even more of an advatage in life and that is that they can kick our asses, while at the same time looking good and not being incredibly overweight. And then as a good girl friend that I know "All gay men are hot." Since effeminate men aren't neccarily gay, but for the most part effeminate men look gay.

So my problem is that all women now want effeminate men and it is pissing the hell out of me. Men aren't supposed to look pretty and be so effeminate, they are supposed to get the money in the family and be gruff. This doesn't mean be asswholes, but they shouldn't have to be all cute and so on. Just look at all the new models - not a single fucking hair on their entire body NO ME FUCKING GUSTA. This is just my rave because I have always thought I was better than the little girly boys and now I have to question that idea.

Franson your recent statement declaring Andrew Jackson an equivant to Hitler was quite obsene and pussyish. What Jackson did was absolutely vital and if you are going to tell there was a better way to deal with the Indians I would like to hear it. But you probably preach love and peace but in this instance it would not have worked to the least, because the Americans would not have excepted sharing the land the stole from the Indians. I won't say that killing the Indians on the Trail of Tears was to humanitarian, but it was the only possilbe way of dealing with the situation that would allow the Indians to keep some culture and keep some land.

Firstly, if Abraham Lincoln really did issue an anti-Native American Proclamation as well, and it really did have the effect of destroying their people and their lifestyle, there was indeed a reason for it. Most of the tribes had (prior to the Emancipation Proclamation) sided with the Confederate States. Thus, they were part of the threat to the North and its armies. Would you refrain from shooting a Native American in favor of a Confederate soldier if they were both charging at you with swords drawn?

Secondly, Lincoln was no Hitler, nor was he a Stalin. If you want to attack a former President for damaging the Indian Nations and their cultures, why not Thomas Jefferson or Andrew Jackson? As far as I can tell (again, refute me if I am incorrect), Lincoln did next to nothing compared to those two (who stole most Native American-controlled land in the Great Plains and moved almost every Native on the East Coast to Oklahoma Territory reservations, respectively).

Thirdly, Abraham Lincoln was a great man because he believed in reuniting the Union. He knew that if he did not do so, the still-fledgeling nation would fail, as two divided halves are much weaker than one united whole. If it weren't for Lincoln, none of the prosperity the nation witnessed from 1865 on would have come to fruition. Jesse, please respond to this, I'm interested to hear the logic behind your argument.

First off, I stated that Lincoln was intelligent in the way of war terms as the Emanipaction Proclamation satisfied the Union slave holding states, showed to France and the United Kingdom that the Union was still fully united, and to a very small extent weakened Southern economy during the war, but drastically helped in destroying the Southern economy in the Reconstruction years; therefore I said nothing that he was a good person, but a smart war strategist.

Second, in comparing Lincoln to Hitler that analogy was very off. Hitler was elected to bring the people out of a depression and he used the fear and anger against Jews and other people to help bring that economic change about. Lincoln on the otherhand didn't even face a depression so he couldn't have used the fear and anger of the Indians to have them and their buffalo killed. The analogy I think would be closer (eventhough incredibly incorrect still) to Stalin and the Stalinist purges that took place before the actual Holocaust itslef.

Lastly, No where can I find any source saying that Lincoln did put any bounty on the Indian's heads. Now if this was apart of the Homestead Act, which wasn't issued on the day of the Emancipation Proclamation, give me some proof. And if it was apart of the Emancipation Proclamation give me some proof by quoting the proclamation, and if it is in a different proclamation than the Emanicpation Proclamtion, but still issued that same day as you stated, give me proof of that proclamation and quote it for me. I want you to do this because I have no knowledge of what you said about the bounty, and I would enjoy for you to enlighten me - Por Favor!

First off I haven't had time to write due to personal reasons, secondly I've gotten 3 hours of sleep in the last 5 nights so forgive mew if this makes no sense at all.

I want to continue my speaking on the topic of Abraham Lincoln. Abraham Lincoln is to most Americans as Hitler still is to many Germans. I don't care what any of you say, but Abraham Lincoln was one of the evilest men of the 1800's. He may have freed the slaves but he also killed my people, the Native Americans in mass numbers. Not only did he put a bounty on every native Americans head the same day he signed the emancipation proclamation, but he also paid hunters to kill the buffalo. It was a "holocaust" in its own right. Now I ask you, was he a wonderful man? When your parents, teachers and pretty much everyone else have told you something it is always hard to accept it as an outright lie. But I ask you with all my heart, for the sake of history and the sake of the good name of my people realize what this man has done!

Signing off confused, tired and outright annoyed, Jesse Donat

Once again the scene from Hamlet is used to show an idea of debate, but in this instance it applies to the current issues of the Middle East? I have my own opinions on this issue, but I would like to hear Jesse's, Franson's, and Jeff's(as hacked into some one else's account. What I want you guys to talk about is should America be in support of Isreal or should we be supporting the Palestinians? Guys respond to this question.

Eventhough this isn't the movie review section, I still want to comment on the movie American History X because i found it wonderful.

The movie centers around the brother of a skin head who goes to jail after killing two black men, and then in jail he meets a black guy that he relates too. When he gets out of jail he tries to stop his brother and the rest of his town from keeping up their rascist practices. To begin with, this movie truthfully brought tears to my eyes. I am not going to say that I am Mr. Tough guy that won't cry, but it is still a rare occasion that I will cry in a movie and this movie made me do it. Also what I loved about the movie is that it showed racism from a completely different view and the viewer actually would start feeling sorry for the skinheads in that the black gangs and such were making their lives misserable. But than to counter what I said the movie is not a pro-white movie in the least it is a movie that is anti-racist.

The movie inspired me to write what am about to do right now and that is my topic on racism and sexism. My personal opinion on black people and white people and yellow people and red people is that they are completely neutral. All black/white/yellow/red are not good and they are not bad they are merely just a skin color. When I was watching TV I saw some peace ad talking about how black people are good people. This is a completetly bogus and racist comment. Because black isn't a way of classifing people but instead it is just a skin color. On sexism, I just came to the realization that when a teacher forcing people to sitting in the rows by girl boy and so on, or do anything according to girl boy and so on, that teacher is being sexist. By saying that women and men are different the teacher is saying that men and women are different more over than just the physical attributes. Basically what I am saying is that rascism and sexism are enbedded so far into our society that even those who are trying to do some good in combating the issue are still rascist and are still using rascist actions. And that is something pretty crappy to think about.

I Have been away and silent for a fair amount of time, but it is impossible to not shut up when Jesse directly attacks the integrity of history and honor. How dare you Jesse, say the Nixon, the pussy, is our best president, haven't you ever heard of Vietnamization, Nixon's horrible plan to leave Vietnam with dignity. It was very possilbe to win the Vietnam war, but instead Nixon merely pulled us out of it. The Vietnamese attack on their Tet Holiday proved that the Vietnam war was almost over, as the American troops successfully defended themselves against the largest Vietnamese attack. Instead of winning the war in Vietnam, which was very possible, Nixon says hey what the hell lets remove our troops from Vietnam in a slow and long lasting process. And then you went on to say that Teddy Roosevelt was one of the greatest presidents, I thought you were a conservative. Teddy is probably the sole president to ruin America as he used the Sherman anti-trust plans to break up corporations, futhering the government's medling in the economy, as well as he turned America from a nice unimperial government into the police of the new world as he involved the country in the "Boxer Rebellion," "The Russo-Jap War," Panama Canal, Venuzualla, and then he created the Roosevelt Collary. And lastly Abraham Lincoln does score some points with me because the Emanicaption Proclamation. The proclamation was an ingenous war measure as he showed Europe that he had control over the South, and also avoiding pissing of the Union slave owning states. My picks for greatest presidents are probably, Polk of course, Old Hickory, and then Silent Cal.