Jesse I come to the conclusion by reading your previous article that you are a very naive little boy. This naivity I wish to all God's creatures that I was apart of, but instead I must realize that this is not the case. The reason that he was shot many times was, as history has told us, to keep the minorities and other groups as far away from the federal government as possible through fear. Fear is a word that has been used many times to talk about communist Russia and Stalin, but the truth is that America is using this fear just as well much as Russia but much more subtle. To stop my editorial I would like to say I am not arguing with you per say, but really I am explaining government reasoning and not my own here. Now the member of the Somalian community and the black community have already learned, that if you don't stay in your place and you start getting upidy than you will be forced back into the slums you came from. And this is peaceful and indivual America here not Russia. This treatment is merely used to allow WASPs to retain supreme control over the federal government.
The African American population has expierenced this quite well throughout there history. And especially through the twentyth century African Americans and all people of dark skin for that matter have been forced back down to a place of no power in the government. When the civil rights movements came around obviously preaching to us the injustices of America, what happened. They were not greated with flowers and other nice ammenities but instead guns, dogs, and water houses.
Native Americans have felt the oppression of WASPs and their attempt to assert complete control in America moreso than African Americans. Native Americans were not just oppressed but instead foribly removed from their land and settled into what was known as the Great American Desert. And worse Andrew Jackson when originally moving the Indians off their land never thought that America would urbanize all around them, which obviosly happened. So to an effect they were stripped of their original land and then stripped of some of government promised land. The reason to this is that if Indians had equal power in the country the WASPs wouldn't be able to assert supreme control and they would have another dominate group to contend with.
This same treatment is occuring to catholics, women, (not Jews because as Samuel Eisenberg pointed out to me that Jews run the country . . . somehow?) and all other minorities. This horrid treatment that you were touching on in your editorial is nothing new and it is just how the government controls its people and allows for a WASP nation to rule over us all. America -- Where All Men Are Creating Equal?
***WASP means White Anglo-Saxon Protestant and it conotates for a man as well in that***
I have learned something that pisses me off not just at cops but at the entire system. Cops are taught to shoot to kill under any circumstances, HOW HARD WOULD IT BE TO SHOOT TO INJURE?? You have most likely heared of the Somalia man who was shot 16 times for hitting a cop car with a machete and crowbar. Was this nessessary? I think not, I dont think lethal force should be used unless somone is in imediate danger. Even so, they could have shot him once in the leg, or trew somthing at him or somthing. He hadn't hurt anyone so why was it nessessary to kill him?
I feel the same as for fiscal reasons, no one should ever loose their life for stealing money! "Money, so they say, is the root of all evil today" quoting Pink Floyd. Money is not more important than anyones life and it should be treated as such.
Another thing that realy gets me is these car chases. How is it nessessary to risk the lives of everyone on the road by having these high speed car chases? If you get the licence plate number of the car you can find them, and if its not their car, they get away, but so what? Isn't the point of the police to protect and serve the public? Well if they are chasing cars and risking all of our lives doing so, how are they protecting us? I believe this is just because the cops like to show their authority over us( i think this is why they joined in the first place) so by letting us go they would show they are not quite what they want to be so they risk all of our lives so they can prove their authority. I say no, stop them before they kill again!!!
Well to sum up my thoughts write very poorly in anger, LETHAL FOURCE IS NOT NESSESSARY UNLESS SOMONE IS IN IMEDIATE DANGER AND COPS SHOULD BE THOUGHT THIS, NO ONE SHOULD BE KILLED FOR REASONS FISCAL, AND CAR CHASES DO NO ONE GOOD.
I would like to congratulate Jeff and Jesse for achieving 5000 hits, because I know it wasn't easy for them to create this much bull shit, but they did it and we are all worse of for it. Instead of continuing my celebratory phrases I would instead like to describe the newest member of the Oasisband team the 5000 hit thingy guy. To all you intellectually superior beings out there like myself you don't have to read this but to you feebs here is a history lesson. The reason Teddy, the one of the left, is weilding a bat or a stick you might call it is because of the big stick diplomacy that dominated Teddy's presidency and was the precusor into the American involvement of WWI as he changed the American pattern of isolationism into imperialism. FDR is carrying propoganda papers because his presidency can be remebered by the propoganda of the time saying that FDR was a good president also the WWII propoganda that was ever present throughout WWII. Regan is carrying a light saber for obvious reasons, in that he was the president who started operation Star Wars to protect America from missiles and other such airborne weapons through a satelite in space. And lastly Gore is in the background with hate rays because we all know the evil he would have spread if he were to have become president (I supported Gore for that very reason actually).
That there is the BIOS of the new and wonderful member of the Oasisband team, and Jeff and/or Jesse congrats on turning a crappy idea for a website into a horrible monster that constantly consumes brain mass from the viewing public. Amen I say to you.
I would like to start out this editorial by saying that I have nothing against women and they contribute to the economic and social betterment of this nation, while at the same time allowing me to stare at something prettier than Jeff or Steve's (or my own) ass. But I attack some of the bad effects of feminsim because they need to be talked about eventhough I still support the advancement of women in a society controlled by men. The problem is the forciation into a state of submission towards female issues. A couple of good examples of this is in school if I try and express my view point on the women's movement it immediatly gets shot down, and not only does it get shot down but is gets shot down by the lack of evidence and lack of logic that teachers are trying to promote being used. Feminism has forced these people to mindlessly follow what they have been told about the wonders the feminst movement has done for use. Another example is when I was in church my deacon said that Adam was the one to first eat of the horrid apple that has supposedly cursed mankind from the day of its eating. Now the problem with this is that the bible says that it was Eve to originally eat of the apple, so why doesn't my deacon just say that? The reason is that feminism has pushed him into a state where he merely urges to be politically correct and to aviod offending any women. That seems queer to me because why should we change history to accomodate to not hurt some women's feelings? And that right there is one of the reasons I dislike the movement.
The other reason I dislike feminism is because at least one of arguements that is largely equated to feminism is the issue of abortion. I dislike the stance by a fair number of feminist groups is that their are very hypocritical arguements. To begin a common arguement is that I shouldn't even address this arguement because I am a man and this is a female issue, but if this child is merely a female issue than why should men have to give economic support to the child? If men have no choice on the issue of abortion, meaning that the child is soley the property of the mother, than they should not have to pay for something that they have no ownership of. This is very hypocritcal. Also why is the child the property of the mother to kill. NOW a women's organization supports pro choice, and at the same time they don't support the death of Andrea Yates, who killed her children. In other words this only brings me to the conclusion that NOW and other women's organizations place women over children saying that they are important, and that it is quite okay to kill your children, with no punishment to the mother. Wow this issue simplified seems really awkward that NOW and a significant percent of women's organizations support killing and no redemption to the killer. And I have said is once and I will say it again, that just doesn't settle in my stomach.
To reiterate I support most of feminist ideals and feminst organizations, but too many of their failures go untalked about because it has become a taboo issue and instead we the common people are just told to put blindfolds over our eyes and listen to what ever the feminists tell us. And I can not do that.
Well, now popular culture has gone and done it. Perhaps this is one time too many to lash out at the media whores and money snatchers, perhaps it isn't. You be the judge.
Now then, for the reason behind this article. This is perhaps the single most frightening thing that has happened to me in the last year, if not my entire life. Now then, I was drawing parallels between the society of the 1950's and now (perhaps Andrew can relate to the assignment), and I came across the following: Buddy Holly (along with several other notable musicians of the time), Ben Hur, and The Catcher in the Rye. Now this, in and of itself, may not seem so bad. However, following this, and some in-depth thought processes, the best parallels I could come up with were N* Sync (Stync), Dude, Wheres My Car, and (pick a crappy grocery store romance novel title and insert here). Does this scare the hell out of anyone besides me?
After viewing another informative episode of the O'Reily Factor on FOX news I came to the conclusion that I despise the program PETA. Than after reading Franson's inspired article on Oprah being the Queen of Feebs my hatred of PETA grew to a point where I couldn't retain it. The problem PETA with that I found is that it is tax exempt; this is because it is a non profit, government sponsored organization. And the problem with tax exemption is we the tax payers and future tax payers of America are having to pay extra to cover the amount that the tax exempt organization are not paying, which ultimately means that we the tax payers and future tax payers are giving money to these organizations. This would not bother me if my money was going to an organization that contributed to the betterment of America, as PETA openly does not do. PETA funds terrorist attacks on American companies that don't sponsor PETA's radical views of screwing humans and saving cows. As well as PETA isn't exactly a partial organization in the meaning that they definitly have an agenda and a radical view point, which means that all Americans are funding radical view points as well as terrorism, and that just doesn't settle in my stomach. PETA's tax exemption is a horrible problem that spawns from the Clinton administration, but then I ask myself the question, When the hell is Bush going to do something about it? So I personally wrote a letter to PETA and a letter to my state senator explaining my extreme disocontent and I would urge any American citizen who doesn't want their tax money supporting a radical terrorist organization, that is actually hindering the progress of America and not benefitting America in the least, to do the same as myself and petition to your state senators and write possibly a very threatening message to PETA telling to stop funding terrorism and stop putting their tax debt on the rest of the American, honest, tax payers. God Bless America -- God Crush PETA!
To continue my rapidly-emerging expose on those of feeble mind, I will now rant, rave, and otherwise commit random acts of lunacy about the queen of them all: Oprah. She has been given the title of "Borg Queen of Feebs". Where she was crowned this (inside my very own skull, boys and girls) matters not. What is truly important is the evil swarm of feeble parents she has spawned, and now intends to destroy the world with using a giant "feeb ray" (you heard it here first, kiddies). However, you may be thinking, "how can Oprah be the Supreme Queen of Feebs? I thought that was my sister!" Your sister may very well be the closest associate of Oprah; that is not for me to prove or disprove. However, I present to you these startling facts: for the first (and only) time, I actually stopped flicking rapidly between channels on the Oprah Show. I wanted to change the channel, and with all my might I tried, but I simply couldn't. Also, through what I could catch, she was blaming all the world's evil on either MTV (idiotic, but not too bad) or violent video games. Yet, even through this obviously feebish (word of my own creation) activity, I was transfixed. Thus, Oprah is corrupting (or has corrupted) all our parents, who will raise her to power in the post-feeb ray apocalypse. I hope, for all our sakes, that she can be stopped.
Well, I was walking through the halls of the High School today (and the rest of my time there, (and the vast majority of my time in the public school system, for that matter)), and a shocking realization came to me. It was, and I quote: people, in general, are feebs. But why? Why are people such intolerable feebs? Then, another startling realization came to me. It was, simply, that popular culture, being the root of all evils, is also the root of this one. I mean really people, Take a step back and a look at what popular culture is, and even more importantly, what it isn't. It isn't about knowledge; if one were to do nothing but become entirely immersed in popular culture, on the day that such a poor, unfortunate soul went to his grave, he would have no idea of concepts as simple as what the heck a book is, or who George Washington was. Consider this: have you ever seen an ad for the newest bestseller, or even one of the great classics of literature, on MTV? Thus, it isn't about intelligence rising to the top, and stupidity sinking to the bottom (the ideal society, in my opinion). It's purely about mindless sex, terrible music, and above all, STUPID BRAINDEAD FEEBS. I hope that this little paragraph has given you some valuable insight into how bad society has become over the last few years. I know it should have.
I want to start my editorial off by declaring that I have no problems with Franson now that I have met him, and realize that he is a good person. But with that comment I would like to continue to say that if you ever use the phrase Jumped the Shark I will jump you with a Hitler Youth Knife. And to a further extent I will turn you into a whoriation and a pogue at the same time. But on that note I also give you Kudos because unlike the disgruntled idiot that falls under the psydo name Krispy (which he isnt) doesnt know how to use the phrase to the least extent. To avoid other confrontations of stupidity the other phrases that you are no one else can say are as listed below. Pogue, Hitler Youth Knife, psydo Ass, quazi Bitch, Stussi deine kopf nicht on dar lampe, Stussi deine impr?gnieren on dar lampe, whoriation, whoriator, or any other sort of line that I use on occasion. Yes, yes I will admit it AP has sent me over the cliff and I have snapped, and to an extent a raving psycho fool. And you quoting this line that I stole from Duffy, who stole from some other place that got it from Happy Days, makes me go even more crazy. So you have twisted my nipples to far as you pushed me from being crazy to stark raving mad. On one hand I applaud you efforts, but on the other hand I plan on killing you slowing while you sleep and watch you suffer under the sleak wisdom of my once Nazi weilded knife. El Fin (of the editorial and possibly of you).
Wow. Morpheus now sucks. Without Napster, the pornography-free music download software, as a whole, is absolutely awful. I'd even go so far as to say it "jumps the shark", if you will. How could all of these problems have been solved? By leaving people to run their business. Lassiez-faire capitolism is a good thing, for the most part. So long as someone isn't controlling the market of their products (which Napster was NOT) and driving up the prices of their products, thus screwing over the consumer (Napster never committed this act either), lassiez-faire works just fine. Napster wasn't controlling its field of business, as it never came anywhere close to controlling the music industry (which reported record-high profits in every single year following Napster's debut). The crux of my argument, stated simply, is that if the music industry had not whined and complained about having a single, small competitor for so long and to so many, I could still enjoy a Saturday morning discovering the best damn bands there are to be found. Thank you, music industry, and thank you judicial branch for ruining Napster, thus demolishing these small bands' only chance of success. You've done us an irrepayable favor.
